Test Bank

 

 

  1. How are victims treated by the Criminal Justice system in Canada? What are the three criminological theories on victims? Explain them.
  2. Discuss the pros and cons of Restorative Justice.
  3. Compare and contrast restorative justice and retributive justice.
  4. Briefly discuss each of the following concepts and give examples:

a.       Rape shield laws

b.      Precipitation theory

c.       Lifestyle theory

d.      Routine activity theory.

  1. What is money laundering? What are the social consequences of this crime? Give some examples of money laundering.
  2. Based on the video City of God, do you think that Peacemaking Criminology would work? If so why, and how, and if not why not?

 

 

TEST FORMAT

 

There will be two sections. Section A will have two compulsory questions.

Section B will have three questions for you to choose two.

The value of each question in section A will be 9 points and the value of each of the chosen questions from section B will be 6 points. Please read the evaluation criteria below for more details.

 

 

Definitive evaluation criteria

 

The criteria are formulated in the form of questions. A positive response must be given to the following questions in order to obtain full credit for each answer. The value of the evaluation criteria is as stated after each of question.

 

1.      Did you answer the question comprehensively? Are all relevant problems discussed? Was the answer readable and well organized? Did you make connections between issues discussed in your answer? Value of this criterion: 3 points for the questions in section A, and 2 points for the questions in section B.

2.      Did your answer discuss problems by reference to theoretical issues learned during the course? Did your answer relate to the issues and topics discussed in class throughout the course? Did your answer show an understanding of the appropriate readings or class discussions? Did your answer show an understanding of the discussions and issues arisen in class? Value of this criterion: 3 points for the questions in section A, and 2 points for the questions in section B.

3.      Is there a critical personal assessment of the topic discussed? Does the personal assessment show some originality? Value of this criterion: 3 points for the questions in section A, and 2 points for the questions in section B.